Interaction From Allies to Minorities: Recognition of Privilege
Recently,
a school-sponsored promotion was being organized on my campus for a “drag
show.” Notice the quotations. This alleged “drag show” was to allow
volunteers from anywhere get up on stage to perform under the ever-so-elegant
premise of “boys dress as girl” and “girls dress as boys.” The gender essentialism alive here is enough
to make a trans* activist vomit, and factoring in the negative attitude in my
community doesn’t make it better.
Neither did the addition of this picture to their advertisement:
Neither did the addition of this picture to their advertisement:
Because apparently a drag queen is only as fabulous as her beard. |
Since
the program wanted to take volunteers from this community, it would undoubtedly
begin to reflect the same attitude the community holds. With a recent addition of a unisex restroom
on campus which has increased trans* visibility voicing their needs and has
also ended up spending some of the school’s budget on this project, the
ignorant privileged (and, unfortunately, most vocal aspect of any community)
are very upset with us trans*folks.
The
program, however, did have noble intentions.
The student organisers (a group of 18 year-old first-years) saw the
bullying and violence in the media against trans* people and wanted to create a
program to educate against these, which is not remotely close to how the
program was advertised, their male-presenting drag queen saying volumes about
the sort of show they were expecting to put on.
I don’t believe that these expectations were intended to be harmful, but
how could a group of students outside the trans* community understand the
harmful nuances that live in everyday life against trans*folk that they were
effectively glorifying? Alone, they
couldn’t have. Which is precisely why communication with the community at hand
is imperative. You would never buy shoes
for someone without knowing their size, and for the same reason you should
never advocate a program for a group of people without understanding what they
face, especially when representatives from that group are as easy to contact as
they are in my community. They are very
few excuses to be an ignorant educator, and I can’t think of one that would
apply here, especially with the social phonebook of Facebook at our fingertips.
Interaction by Minorities to
Allies: Facebook.
Facebook
has turned into an impossible medium where professionalism and
self-expressionism are expected to fluidly combine since your Thursday drinking
buddy is now in the same realm of existence as your boss’ husband. Facebook is also an incredible plane of
interconnectivity and networking – I’ve added Friends from around the country
that are potential professional networking connections for activism, on the off
chance they just happen to know about a resource I’m desperately searching for. And with many of these people I have
wonderful comment-section discussions on the attitudes toward various groups,
the politics behind them, and the implications of what it all means in the
grand scheme. We also tie into this a
lot of resentment toward various institutions…which members of those
institutions, also on my Friends list, tend to see and get upset about. Whether or not they’re just in resenting my resentment is a different story, but the immediate
results are tension between them and myself.
This presents the awful dichotomy of either speaking my mind on issues
and mobilizing people through emotional discourse or remaining completely
emotionless and impartial toward circumstances that infuriate, insult,
marginalize, and oppress me and my community.
This is quite the activist’s dilemma since both of the above strategies
are completely necessary and useful in making progress, and Facebook doesn’t
make fixing the issue very easy. I am of
the belief that fiery anger from oppressed groups is necessary and should be
understood by the overprivileged. In
fact, if the first letter is to be followed by them, this latter half should
render itself null. Unfortunately, many
overprivileged people will not recognize their privilege and how it effects
their expected entitlements, so precautions on the activist’s end need to be
made.
Specifically, it may be useful to
remember that when you’re speaking in a public forum (such as your status
updates) or a semi-public forum (such as groups), non-community allies or
potential allies may be seeing your reactionary fire to a certain topic and
feel threatened or directly insulted by your anger (justified as it may
be). This is not only stigmatizing to
your community and hurtful to those on the receiving end (if they’re not
upholding their part above), but depending on how you prefer to be an activist,
it may be detrimental to your cause since it drives a divider between yourself
and your privileged, entitled sympathisers who can be imperative to your
movement’s success. Careful balance and
consideration are needed in social media outlets in order to get done what
needs to be done. Though it may seem
like it’s softening the effect of your political blows, it may also strengthen
the relationship between yourself and potential allies. Judgment is your best friend here.
"You would never buy shoes for someone without knowing their size, and for the same reason you should never advocate a program for a group of people without understanding what they face, especially when representatives from that group are as easy to contact as they are in my community." <--I love that comparison but it does raise one question from me as well. How is it decided who is a representative of any group or demographic? Is anyone from a community considered a representative for that community or should more be considered?
ReplyDeleteTo continue on that shoe metaphor. It would also be like buying a pair of leather shoes for a member of PETA. It's a well intentioned gift. I mean its free shoes after all. Although without asking it could be a disaster. You would think it would have occurred to housing to ask LGBTA about this considering how large and well known of a club they are. Allies should certainly take note of this for future reference to not go out and try to be activists for us, lest they work against what they are trying to achieve without meaning to do so.
DeleteI agree that advocate groups *absolutely* must include information from the community they advocate for. RHA made an unbelievable error in judgment, and I seriously can't fathom how any competent professional could have approved that poster.
ReplyDeleteI would also caution Allies to avoid the expectation that someone will "tour-guide" their experience. Sensitivity, cultural competence, and acting with intention are absolutely necessary for effective advocacy.
I can think of about 10 professors whose course evaluation should have included the phrase "there very few excuses to be an ignorant educator."
While I can see where these people were coming from, I believe that they took the worst path to get to their desired goal. If people are going to advocate for another group of people, they should not go in blind. Knowing what you are talking about is important, so your good intentions do not come off as discriminating. I had no idea about the 'drag show' that was being posted around campus, and had I seen it,I'm pretty sure my jaw would have dropped.
ReplyDeleteYup. YUP. yup. I admire how you have tied so many topics into one cohesive idea. The "drag show," their backlash to your (correct) criticism and the power of Facebook is a web of people, ideas and reality. These "first-years" did not seem aware that their event was offensive and poorly planned. Although they were focusing on "bullying", it seems hypocritical because they seemed to be bullying a whole community by mocking and judging them through a poor competition. Im so glad that you wrote them an email and it was eloquently written. You are a very active activist, and I admire you so much for it. I like that you hold people accountable and want to peacefully work with them. You are an inspiration and a role model.
ReplyDeleteI concur with 20thPaul's comment, how is one to decide who in the community is responsible for communicating with? I know we do panels for trans* awareness, but is 2-3 people enough to adequately represent the trans* community? Regardless, great post and thanks for being awesome with this entire "drag show."
ReplyDeleteGreat blog very well written. I enjoy the idea of explaining that people need to pay attention to what they are saying because the internet is forever. Once you put something out there it is almost impossible to get rid of. I actually really enjoy the idea of a drag show on campus as long as it is done well. It could be a very positive thing but it must be absolutely fabulous like priscilla queen of the desert.
ReplyDeleteGood post, Kaylee! I remember seeing these advertisements around campus and thinking almost identical thoughts to myself. I think that you bring up so many valid points and I am happy that you have tied it into the trans* community and how it affects them. I do have to be devil's advocate for a moment though: many clubs on campus such as RHA or the one that created this event are very naive and are not as educated on these subjects as you are. We have to cut them a little slack, they don't know wrong until they are told it's wrong. Your metaphor was fantastic, and I think that while you are totally right that they should not try to act as advocates without being more educated, not everyone agrees. Some people jump in, head first thinking they are doing a good thing, when they are in fact making situations worse. I think that it's important to educate more people and get the conversation going. And for the record, I am ecstatic that they finally have taken the time and budget to build a gender neutral bathroom. It was about time.
ReplyDeleteI refuse to cut anybody slack. When you advocate for a minority, you NEED to communicate with that minority. If you're ignorant, you need to recognise that and make yourself not ignorant, or at least have someone who can reguide your ignorance. I refuse to applaud ignorance, despite its intentions.
DeleteI remember you talking about this in class and I must say I was slightly confused. I dont think many intentionally mean to say things wrong and to mislead a group, I personally think many are uneducated about the topic. Although I LOVE social networking, it can be quite dangerous.. Great Blog, thanks for sharing! :)
ReplyDeleteI think it is important that you are bringing up issues that affect us at Winona State regarding the trans* population. The inclusion of the unisex bathroom to increase trans* visibility is a great step to make sure that these bullying measures do not happen on our campus. Great post! I love your conviction and passion in what you are writing about.
ReplyDeleteGreat blog! A drag show on campus would b a great event!
ReplyDelete